(no subject)
Seriously, if Republicans honestly don't have any idea that White House watermelon gardens or cartoons about shot-dead chimps related to stimulus plans are connected to historical racial stereotypes, if they really don't know and claim to be clueless --
HOW CAN THEY EXPECT US TO BELIEVE THEY HAVE A GODDAMNED CLUE ABOUT ANYTHING ELSE?
God, I'm sick of this bald-faced lying.
HOW CAN THEY EXPECT US TO BELIEVE THEY HAVE A GODDAMNED CLUE ABOUT ANYTHING ELSE?
God, I'm sick of this bald-faced lying.
no subject
no subject
Except this is even cruder.
I can kind of see this getting past a cartoonist's own filters -- if somehow it were actually created with nongodawful intent, okay, I can understand how a person can put a couple of thoughts together in one way and then be clueless about how else those thoughts might be put together. But I can't see it getting past an editor who's doing his/her job in good faith.
And that "apology" -- ooooooh. I just love apologies of the form, "I am sorry you took that the wrong way."
---
* Seriously, I don't think I heard of the watermelon thing until my twenties. And apparently it's a stereotype that dogs hate black people and/or black people are afraid of dogs; I hadn't heard that one until last year. God only knows what else I'm missing.
no subject